June 2021 Newsletter
Has the goal changed from wanting most of the population to be defended against Covid-19 to “everybody-gets-the-shot-or-we-punish-them'? We started out with "defend our population from disease", but now we seem to be fixated on "get the right head count”? It’s true that many people like things neat and countable but is that really what we need? I’m here to say, “no, it isn't”. Senator and doctor Rand Paul points out that at least in Kentucky, eighty-five percent of those over 65 have gotten the shot (they are the most vulnerable to death from Covid-19. About one-third to one- half of the population has received the shot. About one third has gotten Covid-19 and survived. In those households, the CDC admits that probably about two people around that patient had enough exposure to the virus to naturally start an immunity-building response. If that household has children, they too have built an immunity-building response. Dr. Paul also said that for those under age twenty-five to die of Covid-19 is so rare that it is more likely they will die of a lightning strike. This rush to inoculate children ages twelve to fifteen is entirely unfounded.
The biggest reason is that we have treatments now. Generally, we don’t vaccinate for diseases we have treatments for until massive research is done. For treatments, we have monoclonal anti-bodies, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and budesonide. These each work well if patients get treatment as soon as the symptoms prompt them to get tested. Even people with metastatic cancer, diabetes, COPD are getting well and then they have a natural immunity. How long will that last? No one knows, but please remember we don't know that for the shot either. The present CDC statistic I read this week is over ten thousand “breakthrough” Covid-19 infections have been reported in Americans who received the vaccine. That statistic is right up there with the one that says eighty percent of the people who got Covid-19 were meticulous about wearing a mask. Here’s an interesting strategy another country has used. A country that is not as wealthy and has to be careful of its medical expenses. In Mexico City, on December 29th 2020, the health people started giving out ivermectin-based kits for home self-treatment (Source: Trial Site News). A person with mild signs and symptoms that tested positive when given an antigen test was given an ivermectin- based kit. A phone-based monitoring program traced these people. Two groups were in this program: one group received the kit and the other did not. This included about 200,000 people. By February, the drop in hospitalizations and deaths was between fifty-two and seventy-six percent. Those survivors then had natural immunity.
The media tries to tell us that natural immunity isn't as good but that is absolutely not true. Natural Immunity has a broader spectrum of defense to variants. Vaccinations are far more limited. Some sources say the jab actually hijacks a good immune system so that it can't develop on its own as well from then on. Boosters and shots for “variants” will be needed the rest of that person's life. Survivors whose immune system rallied to fight the original attack will not need this. That is not to say a person should go out and try to “get the disease”. That’s ridiculous and unnecessary, a virus will find you. Like it or not, you can't “stop a virus”. If you have an immune system that can beat it, you will; whether because you got treatment, a shot or because you took a lot of nutrient supplements, or you had a natural resistance. Let me speak for those who don't want to get the shot. There are many concerns about adverse reactions to the shot. To increase our distrust, we know there is censorship in the media and doctors that will not report an adverse reaction even when it is obviously there. Some people are severely allergic to the serum. Some have a history of horrid reactions to medical procedures, including past vaccinations. This seems especially true for Blacks and Hispanics, and their personal judgement is that they are not a good candidate for this experimental shot. If you’re prone to blood
clots or bronchial restriction reactions you should think about it very seriously. We don’t let pregnant women drink diet soda, so there is no way a pregnant or nursing mother should get the shot. I have read reports of up five thousand deaths. If a drug that was experimental caused even 25 deaths it would be jerked off the market. Is it wise to force people against their better judgement? Who will be liable if that person is forced to get a shot they don't want and it cripples them?
Let me use history and science together. When the AIDS epidemic was rampant in Africa everyone figured that population group would be wiped out. It was quite contagious and children were watching their parents die. However, a strange phenomenon happened. Even the children born of a mother who had AIDS would “have it”, but not get the disease. The children grew up far less susceptible to dying from AIDS. This was reported but not given headlines and I never learned what the scientific explanation was.
Vaccinations are not always the answer. When TB was rampant people found out they could move to a high, dry climate and along with healthy lifestyle choices live out a long life. Later, when x-ray machines came into use, we learned that in survivors the body had walled off the TB infection. The person had Gomes Tumors in their lungs, which look like circular clouds on the x-ray, but the patient had survived. My personal theory is that when the TB patient moved to a high, dry climate, the TB germ didn't replicate as well for lack of oxygen and moisture and the person was able to get ahead of the TB and mount a defense against it. These days we have anti-biotics but those were not even discovered until 1940.
To add science to history, understand that this mRNA gene therapy shot is not approved, it is only authorized for emergency use. The media has forgotten FOR EMERGENCY USE. We are in a giant experiment. About one-third of us have willingly gotten the shot. One-third to one-half have survived a sickness and built natural immunity. If we are to do a real science experiment, there should be a group that gets neither, and we compare how the three groups do over the course of a couple years.
In the course of my researching, the news is more and more that this virus is more about inflammation of the circulatory system. The heart and lungs are both under attack and the blood clotting is of course very destructive to those systems. Glutathione is being recommended to help the lungs heal. That’s a little different use than I ever learned. Of course, garlic and onions keep your blood healthy and less prone to clotting.
Another course of treatment uses extremely high doses of vitamin D3 with K2. I am just starting to research it, but I see I am slow to get on this idea. Products containing D3 with K2 are all over the internet, as well as the shelves at health food stores. Author Jeff T. Bowles has a book that describes his own self-experiments using doses as high as 50,000 IU’s daily, with K2 in either a 5:2 ratio (or even 1:1). Mr. Bowles reports that human fat consumes D3 way more than the other types of tissues in the body. We know people who are D3 deficient are more likely to have a more serious case of Covid 19. It is a small leap to ask yourself if the very overweight. people in our population should be on extremely high doses of D3 with K2 to balance it. You can overdose on D3. Remember, it is actually a hormone and works in many ways to influence the body. More on that subject next month.
Has the goal changed from wanting most of the population to be defended against Covid-19 to “everybody-gets-the-shot-or-we-punish-them'? We started out with "defend our population from disease", but now we seem to be fixated on "get the right head count”? It’s true that many people like things neat and countable but is that really what we need? I’m here to say, “no, it isn't”. Senator and doctor Rand Paul points out that at least in Kentucky, eighty-five percent of those over 65 have gotten the shot (they are the most vulnerable to death from Covid-19. About one-third to one- half of the population has received the shot. About one third has gotten Covid-19 and survived. In those households, the CDC admits that probably about two people around that patient had enough exposure to the virus to naturally start an immunity-building response. If that household has children, they too have built an immunity-building response. Dr. Paul also said that for those under age twenty-five to die of Covid-19 is so rare that it is more likely they will die of a lightning strike. This rush to inoculate children ages twelve to fifteen is entirely unfounded.
The biggest reason is that we have treatments now. Generally, we don’t vaccinate for diseases we have treatments for until massive research is done. For treatments, we have monoclonal anti-bodies, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and budesonide. These each work well if patients get treatment as soon as the symptoms prompt them to get tested. Even people with metastatic cancer, diabetes, COPD are getting well and then they have a natural immunity. How long will that last? No one knows, but please remember we don't know that for the shot either. The present CDC statistic I read this week is over ten thousand “breakthrough” Covid-19 infections have been reported in Americans who received the vaccine. That statistic is right up there with the one that says eighty percent of the people who got Covid-19 were meticulous about wearing a mask. Here’s an interesting strategy another country has used. A country that is not as wealthy and has to be careful of its medical expenses. In Mexico City, on December 29th 2020, the health people started giving out ivermectin-based kits for home self-treatment (Source: Trial Site News). A person with mild signs and symptoms that tested positive when given an antigen test was given an ivermectin- based kit. A phone-based monitoring program traced these people. Two groups were in this program: one group received the kit and the other did not. This included about 200,000 people. By February, the drop in hospitalizations and deaths was between fifty-two and seventy-six percent. Those survivors then had natural immunity.
The media tries to tell us that natural immunity isn't as good but that is absolutely not true. Natural Immunity has a broader spectrum of defense to variants. Vaccinations are far more limited. Some sources say the jab actually hijacks a good immune system so that it can't develop on its own as well from then on. Boosters and shots for “variants” will be needed the rest of that person's life. Survivors whose immune system rallied to fight the original attack will not need this. That is not to say a person should go out and try to “get the disease”. That’s ridiculous and unnecessary, a virus will find you. Like it or not, you can't “stop a virus”. If you have an immune system that can beat it, you will; whether because you got treatment, a shot or because you took a lot of nutrient supplements, or you had a natural resistance. Let me speak for those who don't want to get the shot. There are many concerns about adverse reactions to the shot. To increase our distrust, we know there is censorship in the media and doctors that will not report an adverse reaction even when it is obviously there. Some people are severely allergic to the serum. Some have a history of horrid reactions to medical procedures, including past vaccinations. This seems especially true for Blacks and Hispanics, and their personal judgement is that they are not a good candidate for this experimental shot. If you’re prone to blood
clots or bronchial restriction reactions you should think about it very seriously. We don’t let pregnant women drink diet soda, so there is no way a pregnant or nursing mother should get the shot. I have read reports of up five thousand deaths. If a drug that was experimental caused even 25 deaths it would be jerked off the market. Is it wise to force people against their better judgement? Who will be liable if that person is forced to get a shot they don't want and it cripples them?
Let me use history and science together. When the AIDS epidemic was rampant in Africa everyone figured that population group would be wiped out. It was quite contagious and children were watching their parents die. However, a strange phenomenon happened. Even the children born of a mother who had AIDS would “have it”, but not get the disease. The children grew up far less susceptible to dying from AIDS. This was reported but not given headlines and I never learned what the scientific explanation was.
Vaccinations are not always the answer. When TB was rampant people found out they could move to a high, dry climate and along with healthy lifestyle choices live out a long life. Later, when x-ray machines came into use, we learned that in survivors the body had walled off the TB infection. The person had Gomes Tumors in their lungs, which look like circular clouds on the x-ray, but the patient had survived. My personal theory is that when the TB patient moved to a high, dry climate, the TB germ didn't replicate as well for lack of oxygen and moisture and the person was able to get ahead of the TB and mount a defense against it. These days we have anti-biotics but those were not even discovered until 1940.
To add science to history, understand that this mRNA gene therapy shot is not approved, it is only authorized for emergency use. The media has forgotten FOR EMERGENCY USE. We are in a giant experiment. About one-third of us have willingly gotten the shot. One-third to one-half have survived a sickness and built natural immunity. If we are to do a real science experiment, there should be a group that gets neither, and we compare how the three groups do over the course of a couple years.
In the course of my researching, the news is more and more that this virus is more about inflammation of the circulatory system. The heart and lungs are both under attack and the blood clotting is of course very destructive to those systems. Glutathione is being recommended to help the lungs heal. That’s a little different use than I ever learned. Of course, garlic and onions keep your blood healthy and less prone to clotting.
Another course of treatment uses extremely high doses of vitamin D3 with K2. I am just starting to research it, but I see I am slow to get on this idea. Products containing D3 with K2 are all over the internet, as well as the shelves at health food stores. Author Jeff T. Bowles has a book that describes his own self-experiments using doses as high as 50,000 IU’s daily, with K2 in either a 5:2 ratio (or even 1:1). Mr. Bowles reports that human fat consumes D3 way more than the other types of tissues in the body. We know people who are D3 deficient are more likely to have a more serious case of Covid 19. It is a small leap to ask yourself if the very overweight. people in our population should be on extremely high doses of D3 with K2 to balance it. You can overdose on D3. Remember, it is actually a hormone and works in many ways to influence the body. More on that subject next month.
